Tracing and Disclosure: Belgium Enlists Registrars in the Fight Against Sports Piracy

Registrars are no longer asked only who holds a domain name, but how that holder pays. On 19 August 2026, Belgium’s Department for Combating Online Infringements of Copyright (BAPO) issued five decisions ordering Hosting Concepts, Hostinger, Key Systems and one registry to disclose, within ten working days, data on the holders of domain names used by illegal sports streaming sites. Implementing orders obtained by DAZN and The 12th Player before the French-speaking Business Court of Brussels, and relying on Article 10 of the Digital Services Act and Articles XVII.34/1 et seq. of the Code of Economic Law, the request goes far beyond WHOIS: identities, full IBANs, crypto wallets, IP addresses and twelve months of connection logs, under a strict duty of silence. Measured against the case law of the Court of Justice (Promusicae, Mircom, Coty Germany, La Quadrature du Net), this “follow the money” turn raises questions of territoriality, proportionality and data protection, and opens a path that online brand protection may one day borrow.

Stratocaster: When Copyright Comes to the Rescue of an Iconic Shape

Few product designs have achieved the iconic status of the Fender Stratocaster. Yet, despite its worldwide recognition, trade mark protection for the guitar’s shape has often proved difficult to obtain or enforce. This article examines how copyright law can provide an alternative and sometimes more effective means of protecting distinctive product designs when trade mark law reaches its limits. Focusing on recent litigation involving the Stratocaster, it analyses the relationship between copyright, design rights and trade mark law, and explains why originality and artistic expression may offer stronger legal protection than acquired distinctiveness in certain circumstances. Beyond the specific case of the Stratocaster, the article explores the broader implications for luxury goods, industrial design and consumer products whose commercial value is closely linked to their visual identity. It argues that rights holders should adopt a complementary intellectual property strategy, combining different legal regimes to maximise protection against imitation and counterfeiting, rather than relying exclusively on trade mark law.

30 May 2026
Initially published on iptwins.com

Rush and Distribution: A Sector Map of the 2026 Reveal Day

On 7 October 2026, ICANN published the applications filed in the first new gTLD round since 2012: 1,614 primary applications for 986 distinct strings, submitted by 480 entities. That is fewer than in 2012 (1,930 applications for 1,409 strings), with evaluation fees now at USD 227,000, but the round is more contested: 55% of applications face a competitor, against 39% in 2012. Assigning each string to a sector reveals a demand driven by digital technology. Artificial intelligence is the most fiercely disputed sector, with .AGENT drawing thirteen applicants, and the leading AI companies have secured their own names. Brands have responded with restraint: 333 .BRAND applications, one in five, only nine of them French. Geographic names, so prominent in 2012, have almost disappeared, while niches such as health and the professions are emerging, including a community application for .AVOCAT. For trademark owners, the priority is to screen the list before the objection period opens on 17 November 2026.

9 October 2026
Initially published on iptwins.com

DNS Abuse: How Can Domain Names Linked to the Same Actor Be Connected?

On 18 August 2026, ICANN published for public comment the Initial Report of its DNS Abuse Mitigation Policy Development Process (PDP 1). Among its proposals are Associated Domain Checks: when a registrar acts on an abuse report, it should also examine the other domain names held by the same customer. In its comments of 25 September 2026, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center supports the approach but points out its main limitation: the checks stop at the edge of a single registrar's portfolio. Bad actors know this and spread their registrations across several registrars, which hampers consolidated UDRP proceedings. WIPO suggests exploring cross-registrar mechanisms without saying which data could link the names. The article argues that payment data, pseudonymised, could serve as that common denominator, while acknowledging its limits (prepaid cards, fraud, multiple payment methods): an indicator rather than proof. It marks a shift from a one-domain, one-investigation logic to a network approach.

28 September 2026
Initially published on iptwins.com

Article Information

Author

Emmanuel Gillet

Publication Date

22 September 2026

Jurisdiction

Related Decision(s)

260819-BAPO-D-FR-020 to 024Department for Combating Online Infringements of Copyright (BAPO), FPS EconomyBAPO Decisions 260819-BAPO-D-FR-020 to 024 (disclosure orders addressed to registrars and a registry), 19 August 20262026-08-19
RR/25/00020Tribunal de l’entreprise francophone de BruxellesDAZN Limited and The 12th Player SRL, French-speaking Business Court of Brussels, order of 28 March 20252025-03-28
Please select listing to show.

Filter articles

Filter for Topics
Filter for Industries
Filter for Jurisdictions